Electronics : D-Link DCS-950 10/100TX Internet Camera, Built-in Microphone

D-Link DCS-950 10/100TX Internet Camera, Built-in Microphone

from: D-Link Systems, Inc.




See Larger Image





Binding: Electronics
Brand: D-Link
EAN: 0790069270710
Label: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Manufacturer: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Model: DCS-950
Publisher: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Studio: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Warranty: 1 year warranty


Features:
  • Monitor your home or office over the Internet
  • Record snapshot to hard drive via web browser
  • Captures Video in Extreme Low Light Environments
  • Captures video in low light environments
  • Motion Detection Triggers Recording and Sends E-mail Alerts























Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Buy other D-Link cameras or spend a little more on a Panasonic.
I bought this, a Panasonic Wireless camera, and a Toshiba IK-WB15A wired camera to sample externally-facing cameras for my home. The Toshiba is the best (and the most expensive), the Panasonic is acceptable during the day and a little more expensive, but the D-link is a huge disappointment.

The D-Link DCS-950 doesn't share video via MPEG or Motion-JPEG, unlike some of the other D-Link cameras. It requires a proprietary ActiveX browser plugin, so if you're running Mac OS X, Linux, etc., you'll either need to use Virtual PC or similar technology, or be happy with the single frame snapshots. Also as a result, a lot of the security DVR software will not work with this camera, so check the supported hardware list of any of these packages that you're using, or are thinking about using.

The worst thing is the camera stability. I don't mean physical, although that's very bad, too -- the software crashes frequently and requires power cycling (unplug and replug) to reactivate. As a result, this camera can't go anyplace remote or difficult to access, and can't be relied upon to watch your house if you're not home.



Rating: 2 out of 5 stars - Best Light Level poor support for cable modem network
This is the best low light IP camara I have found in its price range. However I also own an Linksys IP camara and found their software to be far more intuitive and user friendly. They also include support for cable modem style network (DHCP) sharing so you can broadcast the feed to the world. The Linksys was poor in low light situations though. Linksys's motion triggered event software =was much better out of the box as well.



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Figured it Out Finally
Finally figured out how to get around the constant rebooting issue. You shouldn't have to do this but the Camera does give a good picture. Once you open a browser and assuming you can log on and connect the first time, and after you have logged off, don't close the browser or go to another Web page on the same browser. Just minimize it and open another Browser for other Net activity. When you want to connect to the camera again, restore your minimized browser. You should have the Connect screen to sign in with. Have done this process the past few days and have connected everytime. It appears that when you log off from the camera and then go to other websites and then go back to try and log in again is when the reboot issue seems to come up way to often. Had also upgraded to the latest Firmware and that didn't seem seem to make any difference.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - A Poor Product
You never can tell how to qualify opinions like this. I'm a big fan of Dlink cameras. I own and use at work 4 models. This one however is a HUGE disappointment. Here are some points:

1) The camera is very unstable. I upgraded to the latest (1.03) firmware version to be sure I wasn't outdated. The camera locks up at times requiring a factory default to fix. Of course, then you have to spend time configuring again. I've found that turning on "night shot" and sending to e-mail causes a lockup 100% of the time. I've also locked up the camera a few other times and I haven't yet figured out a pattern.

2) Limited functionallity. My other DLink cameras have nice features like upload to FTP and an image that can be pulled and used on websites and such. This one does not. It does have some kind of random image thing that allows you to view an image but since the filename is random, you can't do much with it.

3) Missing timestamp. When you record video, there is no date/time stamp. Support Case ID "DLK397450207" from DLink: "It does not have a date & time stamp." That seems like a dumb thing to do.

4) Inoperability with Server 2003. Support Case ID "DLK397450207" from DLink: "I know we tend to have issues with windows 2003 OS". In other words, if you're thinking about uploading images to Server 2003, forget it.

I bought this because I need a low-lux camera. When I can get a night shot picture, it does look ok. But not much use to me when I have all these problems.

Summary: Move on to the next product. Sorry Dlink. You failed on this one.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Very bad camera, don't waste your time or money
At the computer store I help out with, I have tried to set up the camera and everything went wrong. Poor software, poor documentation and everything else went wrong. Do not buy the camera at all. It is a waste of money and it isn't even worth trying to get it to work properly.



Browse for similar items by category:

 < Previous 
 Next > 
page 2 of  4
 1  2  3  4 
 





Sony Srf-m85v Am/fm/sports | | Investment   Shopping
Money Management
Plumbing








We've covered in too much detail how it's some sort of "open season" on Vonage when it comes to VoIP patents. After dealing with ridiculous and expensive patent lawsuits from companies who failed to actually innovate in the same way Vonage did, the company was pressured by Wall Street to quickly settle the various patent lawsuits filed against the company. Of course, rather than settle matters, that simply opened the door for other companies to go searching through their patent portfolios to see if there was anything they could sue Vonage over. Indeed, following those settlements it didn't take long for AT&T to dig up a patent and sue -- which was quickly settled as well. Thought things were over? No such luck. Nortel just showed up last month to sue and it took all of about a week and a half for Vonage to settle that case as well.

The Nortel case is slightly different because Vonage actually already had a patent infringement lawsuit going against Nortel, but it wasn't really initiated by Vonage. Instead, it had been initiated by a patent holding firm that Vonage bought in 2006. The end result of the settlement doesn't involve money changing hands, but just a cross licensing agreement for the patents. So what's the big lesson that Vonage and others have learned from this? It's certainly got nothing to do with innovating. It's to hoard as many patents as possible so that you have your own nuclear stockpile for when someone else sues you. Want to know why the USPTO is overwhelmed? It's not because there aren't enough examiners (as some will claim) or that there aren't enough funds. It's because the way the system now works is that you are supposed to file patents on every tiny little advancement so you can use it to protect yourself against lawsuits from everyone else. That's not about innovation. It's about waste. In the meantime, since it's still open season at Vonage, who's going to be next? There are a ton of other patents in the VoIP space that can surely be used in a lawsuit, right?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.

This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.






Shoes

Shopping  Created at Sat Nov 22 19:31:42 2008