Electronics : D-Link DCS-5300G 802.11g Digital Zoom Mic Pan/Tilt Wireless Internet Camera

D-Link DCS-5300G 802.11g Digital Zoom Mic Pan/Tilt Wireless Internet Camera

from: D-Link Systems, Inc.




See Larger Image
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

List Price: $419.99
Your Price: $314.64
You Save: $105.35 (25%)
Prices subject to change.

Average Rating:  out of 5 stars
Sales Rank:







Binding: Electronics
Brand: D-Link
EAN: 0790069269530
Label: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Manufacturer: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Model: DCS-5300G
Publisher: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Studio: D-Link Systems, Inc.


Features:
  • First-to-market wireless-G (802.11g) Internet camera
  • Built-in microphone for audio monitoring and recording; built-in motion detection with e-mail notification
  • MPEG-4 short header mode compression for streaming video, JPEG compression for still images
  • Connection to TV or VCR for recording
  • .25-inch color CCD sensor with auto gain control, auto white balance















Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours








Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Great camera......when it works.
Pros: Excellent image quality. Pan tilt and zoom fetures are cool. Has motion detection and email alerts, which I have not used.

Cons: Camera locks up, power cycle required. Setup software is horrible as it does not even detect the camera. Manual configuration is required. Call your mom for tech support rather than Dlink.

I had a very rough start with this camera. Once I had the camera set up I was having a major problem with the video feed stopping while viewing it remotely. Pan and tilt was still working, just no video. I would have to refresh the web browser every 15 seconds to let it reconnect. This camera works 100% of the time when I view it from its private IP address on my network, which led me to believe it was not a hardware problem but rather a config issue since the problem only occured when viewing the camera outside of my network. Called tech support, instead of getting support I was told to replace the camera. So I took matters into my own hands and basically reset defaults in the camera web interface a few times and reset defaults with the pinhole reset about 10 times in a row. I threw the Dlink quick start quide and CD out the window and reconfigured the camera by logging into the camera directly. The video lock up problem appears to be resolved, but the other day while I was playing with the camera remotely while at work, the camera hard locked. It would not even reply to pings on my home network. I had to run home at lunch and power cycle it. I even took advice from these reviews to put the camera on a timer to reboot it every so often. The camera appears to be working great now.

Basically, the bottom line is do not buy this camera if you will not have the abilty to power cycle it. If this problem occurred every blue moon thats one thing, but it seems to happen quite frequently. Check Dlink support site for firmware upgrades that address this issue before buying. I bought this camera so my parents can watch the grandkids, so since it will not be in use all that much this camera is perfect for my needs even with the defect. If I needed a 24x7 security camera (which is really what this is, not a baby monitor) this would be going back to the store. If you do buy this camera, make sure where ever you buy it has hassle free exchanges or refunds.



Rating: 2 out of 5 stars - Doesn't look good...
I was just called to a new client site last week that has 11 of these cameras installed. Of the 11, half at any given time will drop off the network and/or lock up. He was continually calling his exiting tech guy who performed the install to reset them and eventually called me in because he wasn't getting in his own words "what he paid for".

I've used netstumlber and a few other apps to verify the wireless network health, which in my opinion is very good. At the farthest point, I am still receiving 92% signal with a non-enhanced Linksys router. Other devices on his network are problem free; the issues are isolated to the cameras.

Short of recommending the client box them and send them back for a refund, I've emailed DLink for any opinions or aftermarket "fixes". They are running the latest firmware. I've tried to pick a few up on E-Bay to at least test them in a controlled environment, but spending $400 per camera when there are obvious problems would not be something I would be willing to invest in. It would be something I would be interested in since if they do work as promised, I could recommend them to future clients.

My credentials, ex-NYPD officer and instructor, CCNP/CCDP CISSP, have a 10+ year networking business serving major Brokerage houses in Manhattan and have a smaller business auditing networks, recommending network security, and wireless solutions.

I will follow-up if Dlink provides an actual solution. AIM is my username above if anyone has jumped this hurdle.



Rating: 2 out of 5 stars - Camera locks up frequently
I'm on my second DCS-5300G. I sent the first one back because it was locking up all the time. The replacement is also locking up, I guess I'll have to send it back too. I would avoid this camera, at least until they fix the problems. When it works, Video quality and features are OK.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - It was nice before it stopped panning
Camera is easy to set up. Video is of acceptable quality, but Sound quality is good. However, I cannot utilize the microphone and sound monitoring feature from my office because my employer only allows http to get through the network. I'd highly recommend this camera. However, it just stopped panning after about 13 months of very light use. That is, tilting up/down is still working but panning left/right does not. Support is terrible because I could hardly understand the English spoken by tech support. Further, tech support couldn't help figure out what is wrong. It seems that it will have to be sent in for repair and it will cost pretty pennies.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - One of the worst network cams on the market
The camera Locks up many times. It is certainly not for those who want this camera to be monitoring all the time.
The software is messy. It goes to full screen mode and never comes back. Ideally when you are away you would be contrlling the PC through remote. It is very difficult to control this from a remote location.
The software lacks the ability to auto detect the camera at startup.
The software is poorly written by by someone who has never been in this business.
DLINK has no support at all.
Please Don't waste money in this camera.



Browse for similar items by category:

 < Previous 
 Next > 
page 2 of  3
 1  2  3 
 





Dvd Recorder | | Kids   review
Merchant account service
Collectibles & Toy Models








Alienware's flagship gaming laptop, the Area-51 m9750, has plenty of appeal for high-end gamers, but the alien head aesthetic seems dated, and newer components are right around the corner.

The rise and fall of muni-Fi (and rise again): Clearly, the largest story involving Wi-Fi in 2007 was the at-first continued growth in cities awarding contracts with no money involved on their part to have service providers build Wi-Fi networks--and the subsequent failure of these networks to be built. Starting quietly in late 2006, the market shifted for metro-scale Wi-Fi. During 2007, providers decided that bearing the full cost of a city-wide network without city contracts wasn't financially sensible.

The full scope of the low uptake rates in cities that had large portions of the network built out also became clear: rather than 15 to 35 percent of residents subscribing, just a few percentage points would put a network in the top tier. Revenue is apparently also pretty minimal even in cities like Taipei, Taiwan, the network provider for which was predicting 250,000 subscribers by the end of 2006, and had just 30,000 regular users each month at last public report in early 2007.

MetroFi started to tell cities that without an advance service commitment at a minimum level -- an anchor tenancy -- the company couldn't proceed on networks. In 2007, MetroFi lost half a dozen bids or saw contracts canceled due to this change. Its work in Portland, Ore., the biggest network it was building, won't be extended beyond current limited dimensions until additional capital or a city commitment is obtained; the city has said it won't commit to service fees, however.

Meanwhile, EarthLink lost its CEO Garry Betty in January due to cancer. A strong backer of new initiatives to change EarthLink's core business, his death was certainly one of the causes in a quick re-evaluation of the municipal wireless division. New CEO Rolla Huff pulled EarthLink out of new deals, suspended existing ones, laid off hundreds of employees while gutting the metro Wi-Fi division, and appears poised to leave currently built or underway networks, including their flagship Philadelphia effort. They may sell the division, but it's hard to see much worth in it given the current state.

In a smaller bit of news, Kite Networks, formerly known by various names, was sold by parent MobilePro to Gobility with conditions that according to SEC filings by MobilePro weren't met. Kite was once high flying, in the company of EarthLink and MetroFi as one of the major U.S. Wi-Fi network builders. Now it's still in that company, with work on its Arizona networks apparently halted. A suitor has emerged in the form of a regional telecom that specializes in the Hispanophone market (double entendre intended), and which thinks it could boost Tempe subscriptions from the current several hundred to about 300 times that number. Hope springs eternal.

And while AT&T was able to launch a Riverside, Calif., network with MetroFi handling the installation and operation, it backed out of St. Louis, Mo., due to a utility pole problem, and the bidding in Chicago, too. The Metro Connect consortiums in Sacramento and Silcion Valley were unable to raise financing despite the apparent blue-chip participation by Cisco, IBM, and Intel.

County-wide Wi-Fi was also hit again and again by providers who pulled out--CenturyTel in Pierce County, Wash., for instance--or problems with technology or utility poles. In a few scattered areas, Wi-Fi across counties has been built out, but it's not an idea whose time has yet come.

Muni-Fi isn't down for the count. While these high-profile networks in large cities and county-wide networks have mostly hit the skids, more modest networks with well-defined goals continue to be built with a focus on public safety and municipal uses in hundreds of small and medium-sized towns. Brookline, Mass., may be a good example, in which a public safety/public access network was built relatively quickly and with no reported problems.

And there's one big city success story: Minneapolis, Minn. While local provider US Internet wound up spending more than they'd intended, reports from the ground indicate that service works quite well, and subscriptions and interest are quite high. The company was able to respond almost instantly to the bridge collapse a few months ago by deploying additional mesh infrastructure to add network capacity in the area. And it says that it could reach positive cash flow in early 2008. One of their advantages? They secured a substantial commitment from the city for the services they built.

Other trends of the year gone by: Music and Wi-Fi are clearly more aligned, with the new Zune models and firmware from Microsoft allowing wireless sync (but not yet Wi-Fi purchases), and the introduction of both the Apple iPhone and iTunes touch, which allow music purchases over Wi-Fi but not synchronization. (While the MusicGremlin preceded both the Zune and iPhone/iPod options, it didn't seem to gain any market traction in 2007.)

Security continues to be a concern in 2007, although less of one as home users have clearly accepted WPA Personal, at long last, and networks are increasingly encrypted through better software from major hardware manufacturers. Wizards make encryption a no-brainer, when they work. Corporations stung by reports and by requirements from credit card issuers are also clearly protecting their networks better, although I'm sure we'll still see breaches at those firms that didn't cross every "t."

The 802.11n standard's emergence into an interim certified Wi-Fi state was also a significant milestone for faster wireless networking. Shipments of Draft 802.11n products in 2007 increased significantly, while prices dropped so much that it makes perfect sense to purchase a $50 to $80 Draft N router than a comparable G unit. Manufacturers made it clear as the year progressed that hardware sold today should generally be firmware upgradable to whatever the final, not much changed 802.11n standard is when approved in 2008.

Gadget-Fi continued on the rise, as an increasing array of devices included Wi-Fi as a connectivity option. Most notably, T-Mobile launched its HotSpot@Home service, the largest scale offering of converged cell/Wi-Fi calling. By year's end, they had four handsets for sale--two plain, a BlackBerry, and a clamshell--but subscriber numbers are unknown.

What's coming in 2008?

In-flight Internet (over Wi-Fi): 2008 is finally the year. It was supposed to be 2005. Or maybe 2002. But we should see a number of planes, mostly flying over the U.S., equipped with either in-flight Internet access or in-flight text messaging and text email. Connexion by Boeing's failure fortunately didn't discourage a half a dozen competitors who were in the R&D phase when Boeing wrote off its satellite-based Internet access venture.

AirCell, Row 44, OnAir, Aeromobile, Panasonic Avionics, and a T-Mobile consortium are among the announced or nearly announced firms with commitments or trials underway. AirCell and Row 44, focused on the U.S. market, plan to deliver Internet not voice to fuselages; OnAir and Aeromobile are working on mobile-based services, including voice, via existing cell phones and devices.

In 2008, American, Alaska, and Virgin America will launch trials over the U.S., and potentially move into production. OnAir should be expanding in Europe beyond the single French aircraft that's equipped in a trial now to RyanAir's fleet. And Aeromobile's Qantas trial could turn into real usage. There's likely action that will happen in Asia and the Middle East, too, that's not yet disclosed.

Other trends to watch

Wi-Fi in every smartphone with better integration. The iPhone was the leading edge, pun intended, offering 2.5G EDGE cell networking as part of the subscription price, along with seamless roaming to Wi-Fi networks. With RIM finally offering BlackBerry models with Wi-Fi, it's unlikely that any future smartphone model intended for serious users would lack the option.

Wi-Fi everywhere. Despite the setbacks in municipal Wi-Fi, wireless networks continue to expand, with better and better coverage found across larger areas and more locations. 2008 might be the year of hotspot saturation.

WiMax arrives. In 2008, we'll finally see production mobile WiMax in action in the U.S., and the questions about whether it works well enough and fast enough at the right price to beat current generation cell data networks, and make money for the disorganized Sprint Nextel will be answered. More certainly, Clearwire, with WiMax as its only option, will push aggressively to steal customers away from fixed, wired broadband, especially in markets with little competition.

Gadget-Fi a go-go. Wi-Fi will become an expected part of gaming consoles (already found in a few), cameras (found in crippled form in just a handful), regular cell phones (in dozens and dozens now), and music players (with more full functionality).








Shoes

Shopping  Created at Sat Nov 22 19:45:04 2008