Electronics : D-Link DCS-3220 10/100TX Fast Ethernet 2-Way Audio Internet Camera

D-Link DCS-3220 10/100TX Fast Ethernet 2-Way Audio Internet Camera

from: D-Link Systems, Inc.




See Larger Image
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

List Price: $266.99
Your Price: $212.76
You Save: $54.23 (20%)
Prices subject to change.

Average Rating:  out of 5 stars
Sales Rank: 8171







Binding: Electronics
Brand: D-Link
Color: Silver
EAN: 0790069269516
Label: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Manufacturer: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Model: DCS-3220
Publisher: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Sales Rank: 8171
Studio: D-Link Systems, Inc.
Variation Description: Silver
Warranty: 1 year warranty


Features:
  • Product Type - Internet Camera
  • Sensor Resolution - 1/4" CCD
  • Lens Aperture - F 1.8
  • Weight: 1 lb







Editorial Review:

Product Description:


D-Link is pleased to introduce the latest product in Internet camera technology. The D-Link Securicam Network DCS-3220 Internet Camera is a full-featured surveillance system that connects to an Ethernet broadband network to provide remote high-quality video and audio.



Main Features
  • Manufacturer: D-Link Systems, Inc
  • Manufacturer Part Number: DCS-3220
  • Manufacturer Website Address: www.dlink.com
  • Product Type: Surveillance/Network Camera
  • Sensor Type: CCD
  • Video Resolution: 704 x 480 @ 10 fps MPEG-4, 352 x 240 @ 30 fps MPEG-4, 176 x 120 @ 30 fps MPEG-4
  • Illumination: 1 Lux - @ f/2.0
  • Color Support: Color
  • Connectivity Technology: Cable
  • Protocols: TCP/IP, HTTP, SMTP, FTP, Telnet, NTP, DNS, DHCP, UPnP, DDNS
  • Interfaces/Ports: 1 x RJ-45 10/100Base-TX, 1 x Audio Output, 1 x Input/Output, 1 x DC Power Input
  • Input Voltage: 12 V DC
  • Dimensions: 2.12' Height x 3.25' Width x 6.25' Depth
  • Weight: 8.5 oz
  • Standard Warranty: 1 Year(s)





    Accessories:
         see more

    Accessories:




    Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours


    Related Items:
         see more

    Related Items:




    Customer Reviews
    Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

    Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Good all around security camera
    I bought this camera after an incident at my house while I was at work. Luckily a neighbor witnessed the incident and helped me recover damages, but I realized that I needed something to watch over my property when I was not at home.

    This camera has proven to be a great match for my needs. I have it set up to record to my computer hard drive. It sends me email alerts when it detects motion in the covered video area, which is my driveway. I can easily review the video of anyone who drives down my driveway and what they do in front of my house.

    The video quality is great, you can read license plates very easily, and can take snapshots from the videos or export the files to avi format.

    One minor complaint is that the exported avi format isn't as good as the source format. But I really haven't had a need to export video from the supplied software application.

    The software that comes with the system is great. You can monitor one camera or 16. The software wizards have you up and running in minutes. You can even access live video from your camera over the internet - also real easy to set up and access.

    I plan to purchase an additional camera to monitor the back side of my house.

    The optional weatherproof outdoor housing unit is of good quality and is recommended for outside use.

    The system has been up and running continuously for almost 6 months now with no problems.



    Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Nice camera with falkey software
    Camera and the web interface work well. But, I had problems with the management software. D-Link said to downlowd v3.20. That worked the first time.



    Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - decent product for the price
    I paid ~$50 under retail for this on some special deal. I wasn't going to spend retail price on it, as I'm on a budget.

    I've tried many other units, as I setup a DVR on the parking lot in front of my apartment. I tried a Leadtek capture card with Linux Zoneminder, but the quality wasn't very good. For camera, I used a Q-See infared 420line outdoor b/w camera, with very bad results. The image quality was horrible. I couldn't make out a person's face on camera at ANY distance. The only perk was the night-vision was decent - maybe good if you're ONLY watching for large objects moving.

    Okay on the DCS-3220, I'm very happy with it. The 10/100 is a very good feature of the product. I have it in an outside enclosure recording a parking lot. The night vision is very poor when in low-light, but that can be expected. The C-CS mount is good because I plan on getting a zoom lens for ~50 dollars to zoom into certain things. The management interface and program is very good. It is setup to handle 16 of these cameras without any problems - so scaling up is no problem in the future. When recording, this thing eats up alot of disk space. I gave mine a dedicated 300gig drive to put its recordings on. All-in-all, it offers more than I need, which is exactly what I need.

    If I can find a need for another in the future, I'll buy another.
  • Camera Internet Audio 2-Way Ethernet Fast 10/100TX DCS-3220 D-Link




    Browse for similar items by category:


     





    Dvd Recorder | | Travel -  Support
    Bad Credit Loan
    Heating & Cooling








    We've covered in too much detail how it's some sort of "open season" on Vonage when it comes to VoIP patents. After dealing with ridiculous and expensive patent lawsuits from companies who failed to actually innovate in the same way Vonage did, the company was pressured by Wall Street to quickly settle the various patent lawsuits filed against the company. Of course, rather than settle matters, that simply opened the door for other companies to go searching through their patent portfolios to see if there was anything they could sue Vonage over. Indeed, following those settlements it didn't take long for AT&T to dig up a patent and sue -- which was quickly settled as well. Thought things were over? No such luck. Nortel just showed up last month to sue and it took all of about a week and a half for Vonage to settle that case as well.

    The Nortel case is slightly different because Vonage actually already had a patent infringement lawsuit going against Nortel, but it wasn't really initiated by Vonage. Instead, it had been initiated by a patent holding firm that Vonage bought in 2006. The end result of the settlement doesn't involve money changing hands, but just a cross licensing agreement for the patents. So what's the big lesson that Vonage and others have learned from this? It's certainly got nothing to do with innovating. It's to hoard as many patents as possible so that you have your own nuclear stockpile for when someone else sues you. Want to know why the USPTO is overwhelmed? It's not because there aren't enough examiners (as some will claim) or that there aren't enough funds. It's because the way the system now works is that you are supposed to file patents on every tiny little advancement so you can use it to protect yourself against lawsuits from everyone else. That's not about innovation. It's about waste. In the meantime, since it's still open season at Vonage, who's going to be next? There are a ton of other patents in the VoIP space that can surely be used in a lawsuit, right?

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

    Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.

    This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.






    Shoes

    Shopping  Created at Sat Nov 22 19:50:58 2008